|
|
Post by mcpon on Jun 7, 2008 4:03:48 GMT -5
At least, that's how I think the title goes. Has anybody seen it? It's supposed to be in 3-D. I haven't, and was wondering if anybody would suggest it?
What are your thoughts about this movie?
|
|
froggy214
member of Arthur's inner circle
Posts: 88
|
Post by froggy214 on Jun 15, 2008 20:04:37 GMT -5
I bought it as soon as it came out. It is okay - definitely not the regular Arthur we all know and love. The characters and humor are a bit different than the series, and it is kind of weird watching Arthur in CGI. But it is Arthur, and if you are like me, anything Arthur is great!  I would say it is my least favorite Arthur project, but still a good watch. |
|
|
|
Post by nyachu on Jun 19, 2008 15:51:55 GMT -5
Yeah, I've always wondered about Arthur's Missing Pal too...I haven't seen it yet. Arthur in CGI does sound a bit weird, but I'm sure I'll see it eventually. |
|
Sour Grapes
member of Arthur's inner circle
This icon is actually grammatically incorrect, but I agree with what it says. :P
Posts: 76
|
Post by Sour Grapes on Apr 18, 2010 23:17:45 GMT -5
I don't even want to see it because the animation looks so bad and the script doesn't seem like it belongs in the show at all.  It just seems "dumbed down", you know? Shame, too, because it could have been done right. I would watch it to see how bad it is, but I don't think I could sit through that animation. CGI doesn't have to look like that! I'm not asking for Shrek quality in the animation, but something above... um... well, I don't know what the terms are at all, but something that doesn't make the characters look like weird blobby fakes of their selves. I usually like CGI movies based on traditionally animated series. This is the only exception that I can think of. Granted, I haven't watched it myself, so I do feel rather bad for saying these things, but I saw the previews and heard some reviews. I'll get off my negative pedestal now. |
|
Alex
member of Arthur's inner circle
Buster Fan
Posts: 61
|
Post by Alex on May 6, 2010 19:53:28 GMT -5
I don't even want to see it because the animation looks so bad and the script doesn't seem like it belongs in the show at all. It just seems "dumbed down", you know? Shame, too, because it could have been done right. I would watch it to see how bad it is, but I don't think I could sit through that animation. CGI doesn't have to look like that! I'm not asking for Shrek quality in the animation, but something above... um... well, I don't know what the terms are at all, but something that doesn't make the characters look like weird blobby fakes of their selves. I usually like CGI movies based on traditionally animated series. This is the only exception that I can think of. Granted, I haven't watched it myself, so I do feel rather bad for saying these things, but I saw the previews and heard some reviews. I'll get off my negative pedestal now. Sour Grapes, I fully agree with you here. I haven't seen it either, but I have seen reviews, and they weren't very good. CGI looks fake in my opinion, it's almost as if it takes more effort to draw something on paper. |
|
Sour Grapes
member of Arthur's inner circle
This icon is actually grammatically incorrect, but I agree with what it says. :P
Posts: 76
|
Post by Sour Grapes on May 7, 2010 15:35:16 GMT -5
CGI looks fake in my opinion, it's almost as if it takes more effort to draw something on paper. A lot of people have the same opinion. As my sister said, "I'll always like traditional animation best. Unlike computer animation, it looks like they actually tried." |
|
|
|
Post by xlbc21215 on Sept 23, 2012 21:34:11 GMT -5
I saw it on you tube around July to August. It was very awesome, despite the lower quality. It was interesting how they looked yet weird how pal got away... If I could find it in HD, I would've enjoyed it more.
Nice movie but "Arthur it's only rock and roll" was better.
|
|
I would say it is my least favorite Arthur project, but still a good watch.
It just seems "dumbed down", you know? Shame, too, because it could have been done right. I would watch it to see how bad it is, but I don't think I could sit through that animation. CGI doesn't have to look like that! I'm not asking for Shrek quality in the animation, but something above... um... well, I don't know what the terms are at all, but something that doesn't make the characters look like weird blobby fakes of their selves. I usually like CGI movies based on traditionally animated series. This is the only exception that I can think of. Granted, I haven't watched it myself, so I do feel rather bad for saying these things, but I saw the previews and heard some reviews. 
